18 Comments

Best thing on Substack by a mile

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for the kind words. Appreciate your support.

Expand full comment

Always thought-provoking, inspiring and so well put together 🙏

Expand full comment
Feb 13Liked by Patrick Witty

Outstanding piece.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks so much Bill

Expand full comment
Feb 13Liked by Patrick Witty

Incredible read and photos!

Expand full comment

Just WOW

The picture showing the swastika on the tail is really perspective-granting

Expand full comment
author

I didn't know there was a swastika on the tail until I started researching this piece. It's remarkable how little I know about photography and history.

Expand full comment
Feb 15Liked by Patrick Witty

Great article! I've always been curious which photographer took which photo of the disaster and had most of them figured out. What's harder to find is the photos moments before the fire - there is still no known photos or footage of this (except Joseph Spah's onboard footage). There are several other photos very similar to this but based on the position of the port trail rope being stretched way out to the right, Gus Pasquarella's seems to be the last known image. Even so it was about a minute between this image and the first known images of the fire. As Pasquarella's first image shows, the ship drifted quite a bit to the right during this time.

https://lh5.ggpht.com/-5tbGXktk0x4/UPDRdUZbXaI/AAAAAAAACJ8/r4uZpLIdh0o/final%252520moments_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg

It's nice to see the Jack Snyder image in good quality - a few years ago there was next to no mention of it online. I was first made aware of it by a photo of an injured ground crewman viewing the newspaper with Snyder's image on the cover.

There is one image of the disaster I am still looking for in better quality and I'm curious if you have any insights. Harry McGonigal of the Evening Bulletin took what seems to be the earliest press photo of the fire starting, taken a split second before Murray Becker's. I do have a copy of the image on the cover but it is badly retouched. https://imgur.com/hiPOMDF

You can see a former eBay listing of this newspaper here - the inner pages has the image in much sharper quality: https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/hindenburg-disaster-1937-newspaper-415148010

Expand full comment

It's remarkable how many people on the Hindenburg survived. From the photos you definitely get the impression that the fire was so cataclysmic that no one could have survived.

Expand full comment
author

Agree...I think if you were to ask the average person how many people died the answer would be far more than 36.

Expand full comment

I honestly assumed until reading this that everyone on board had died.

Expand full comment

I have seen maybe a third of these images in various places. The work you put into this post/article is incredible. Almost like being there. Thank you!

I often wonder about situations like this, where you know there is serious injury, perhaps death. Do you make the photograph, or out of respect for those suffering hold off. Thankfully, I have never had to make the choice.

Expand full comment

Patrick, this comment doesn’t belong anywhere, but I was thinking of this space you made quite a lot while listening to Ezra Klein’s podcast on January 9, about Taste. At minute 52-ish, he and the guest, Kyle Chayka, talk about curation, its importance, and the relationship one can form with the content that someone who provides that service brings to attention. Within the attention economy, as Jenny Odell, describes it, where is the curator? Or does the curator bridge what Lewis Hyde describes as a gift economy?

Expand full comment

What a great read! Fascinating piece of history!

Expand full comment

Fascinating - thank you.

Expand full comment

Fantastic Patrick, fantastic. Bravo!!

Expand full comment